Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Kristoffer Skaret

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Kristoffer Skaret

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Published by Scroll Versions from space PDOIDC and version master

The following test users data has been prepared with examples of positive search results (Sanction or PEP) in the test environmentsenvironment (CURRENT or PRE-PROD).

Table of Contents

Test persons

#NninFirst name
Name
Last nameExpected result
10076649893Stine AkselsenPEP23034218595Halvard MoenPEP10047122177Jan Erik OlsenSanction17013827222Kari HansenSanction

...

101010750160TomasTopstad
  • key information
  • national address, with number of residents
  • postal address, with number of resident
  • historic addresses
  • sanction and PEP results with different matchindicator
201010750241KariKlaven 
  • key information
  • national address, with number of residents
  • postal address, with number of resident
  • historic addresses
  • empty AML result
301010750322Kris PsaGranum
  • key information
  • national address, with number of residents
  • postal address, with number of resident
  • a collection of sanction and PEP results after simulated fuzzy search
401010751388MortenHolm
  • key information
  • no national address
  • no postal address
  • PEP result - with 'expired' comment
501010751469MiaHolm
  • key information
  • national address, with number of residents
  • postal address, with number of resident
  • sanction result from UN_CONSOLIDATED source
Info

Note that any test user registered in the Nets PREPROD NFOI environment may be used as test subject. Such But such users could will give a positive only negative search result from the address resource, while an empty search result should be expected from the Sanction or PEP serviceperson resource.

See RA Light User Guide about self service for creating test users.

Test organizations

#Organization numberNameExpected result
1234567891TEST2

Limited Company

  • complete key information
  • both addresses
  • no sanction result
  • all roles except deputy
  • beneficial owners
  • shareholders
  • subsidiaries
  • signature rights and power of procuration
  • auditor
  • no accountant
  • financial history 3 years
2345678912Test3

Norwegian registered foreign business

  • key information
  • both addresses
  • no sanction result
  • all roles except deputy
  • no beneficial owners
  • shareholders
  • subsidiaries
  • signature rights and power of procuration
  • no auditor
  • accountant
  • financial history 3 years
3567891234FRIVILLIG SOL

Association club organization

  • key information
  • postal address
  • no sanction result
  • roles except board members
4456789123HANSEN LEIF

Sole proprietorship

  • key information
  • visiting address
  • no sanction result
  • roles except board members
  • beneficial owners
5123456789Utleie Gruppen AS

Limited Company

  • sanction result

Continuous screening test simulator
Anchor
contscreening
contscreening

In the "Current" environment a simulator is available as a test tool. The simulated continuous screening has the following behavior.

  • The merchant registers monitors with collections of example individuals in a usual matter
  • Once every night, between 1 and 3 people in a simulated monitor will be selected as new Pep or Sanction individuals. Alerts are generated, and webhooks will be triggered.
  • These nightly simulated alerts will repeat until there are no more people left in the monitor
  • To resume testing, the merchant simply has to add more people to the monitor.
  • Data returned in the alerts are hard coded and static.
Info

During development and integration testing it might be convenient to trigger immediate alerts and webhook callbacks without having to wait for the regular nightly events.

A particular test person, Tomas Topstad (01010750160), has been prepared for this purpose and will trigger such immediate alerts and callbacks.